Tuesday, June 29, 2010
 
Wake up, Washington!
			
OK, so we're less than 48 hours away from the federal-tax-credit deadline, and  about 180,000 home buyers who have been in escrow for nearly two months  are on the verge of watching that tax credit slip through their fingers.  Why? Because, surprise, it might actually take more than 60 days to  close a transaction.
  The House and Senate have each passed their own versions of an  extension for those who are teetering. But they can't seem to get their  acts together and do what they were elected to do: LEAD.
  Nearly one-tenth of those buyers are in my state. Two of my buyers  are among the throng. I worry for them.
  Here's a quote from National Association of Realtors President Vicki Cox Golder, taken from Realtor Magazine:
  "We are strongly urging the Senate and the House to act quickly to  pass this legislation and ease the minds and pocketbooks of these home  buyers. These are not buyers who just entered into the market. These are  buyers who previously met all the qualifications for the tax credit,  but find themselves at the mercy of a workflow jam with lenders or other  delays such as lapses in the National Flood Insurance Program, Rural  Housing Service, and new home construction, and might not be able to  complete the purchase of their homes by the current deadline. It would  be a tragedy for them not to be able to complete the purchase in time to  claim the credit.”
  Rock 'n' Roll, Vicki!
  I'm not sure I would personally classify it as a "tragedy" (Hey, it's  $8,000; but hey, it's only $8,000), but it sure does suck, dude!
  Is it OK to expect some cooperation and good faith on the part of our  elected officials? Or is polarization and ineptitude the rule of the  day on Capitol Hill? Hey, Barbara and Dianne! Hey Ken Calvert and Jerry  Lewis! Hey Mary Bono! Get off your behinds and start working together.  We're sick of party-line votes. We're tired of your excuses. We're  looking for someone to step up.
  (Brian Bean is a real estate broker and  ambassador for Helping A Million Homeowners, a nationwide organization  that is committed to helping alleviate the financial stress that so many  homeowners face today. He can be reached directly at  Brian@BigDreamInc.com.)
  Brian Bean Real Estate Broker http://www.scott-brian.com/ http://www.orangecrestriversidehomes.com/ http://www.IEShortSalePros.com http://www.HelpingAMillionHomeowners.com
 
 Labels: Corona, Foreclosure, Home Prices, Inland Empire, Loan Modification, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Real Estate, Riverside, Short Sales, Statistics, Temecula 
			  
			  
			  
			  
	
			  
			 
			
 
Saturday, June 26, 2010
 
The Loan-Mod Myth
			
This whole loan-modification thing is getting out of hand.
  Are we really so easy to manipulate, or are desperate people just  clutching at anything to keep from falling?
  So many homeowners on the verge of losing their homes will do  anything, listen to anyone, take any advice, as long as it's  authoritative and the answer satisfies their wants. Why? Because even a  flicker of hope can renew the enthusiasm of a condemned man. Problem is,  loan mods, for the masses, are a Band-Aid on cancer.
  But the voice of reason is drowned out by the shouts for rescue.
  I'm all for hope, but it has be accompanied by action and a dose of  reality. Homeowners in distress hope for miraculous results -- a loan  mod that reduces the amount they owe and cuts the interest rate to  below-market levels. Reality is, if you don't have a job, do you really  think the bank is going to let you keep the house? Urban myths  perpetuate the misplaced optimism. ("My uncle's accountant's niece found  a non-profit that is 'getting good results' on loan mods.") And so,  merrily they go, off to slaughter.
  Sure, a precious few who fit the narrow guidelines and have their  flawlessly completed applications fall on the right person's desk on the  right day will reap rewards. It's happened to a little over 300,000  people. But the vast majority of applicants who are granted 3-month or  6-month trial modifications will never see permanent loan mods. Many  shouldn't even be put through the trial programs. When their  debt-to-income ratio with the trial payment is well above 50 percent?  When they're unemployed? When they're drowning in unsecured debt and can  barely afford to keep food on the table the lights on? I've talked to  people who got the go-ahead for trial modifications with payments at  nearly 90 percent of their take-home pay. That's frickin' ridiculous.
  Less than 1 in 4 people who make it through trial payment programs  actually get a permanent mod. And then 75% of those end up defaulting  again within a year. Why? Because changing someone's payment doesn't  change their habits. And the banks know it. But they can keep on  collecting payments from those desperate souls who cling to the dream  that they will be among the lucky few. And those homeowners will keep  right on paying, even go farther into debt or worse to keep up their end  of the bargain. Only to be crushed by a one-page letter summarily  denying their application and requiring them to make up the back  payments.
  Here's the kicker: While these mod programs are running their course,  so is the foreclosure. And so many times, riding shotgun with the  modification denial is a notice of trustee sale. At that point, it's  game over. Too late to attempt the other options, which were more likely  to succeed, given the time. Options that were the most pragmatic, given  the facts.
  People who could have done a short sale, for instance, instead lose their  home to a foreclosure, preventing them from buying another home for 5-7  years -- at the bottom of the market -- and gutting them emotionally.  The banks actually lose more money than they would have had the property  been liquidated in a short sale. The neighbors on the block suffer from  a blighted home and further-reduced property values.
  And everyone wonders what went wrong?
  The voices are wrong. We have to make better decisions, based on  facts and experience and the guidance of those with proven success. Not  on the Pollyanna-ish opinions of those who don't have a stake in the  decision. Don't buy in to the misguided claims of lawmakers who just  want to keep their jobs. Don't listen to scamming companies who take an  upfront payment to process your loan modification when your gut is  telling you it isn't going to fly. Don't blindly follow the suggestions  of your friends and neighbors. And don't let anyone keep you from doing  what you know is the right thing in the long run. There's too much at  risk.
  We're adults and we have to start acting like it. 
  (Brian Bean is a real estate broker and ambassador for Helping A  Million Homeowners, a nationwide organization that is committed to  helping alleviate the financial stress that so many distressed  homeowners face today. He can be reached directly at  Brian@BigDreamInc.com.)
  http://www.scott-brian.com/ http://www.orangecrestriversidehomes.com/ http://www.IEShortSalePros.com
 
 
 Labels: Corona, Foreclosure, Home Prices, Inland Empire, Loan Modification, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Real Estate, Riverside, Short Sales, Statistics, Temecula 
			  
			  
			  
			  
	
			  
			 
			
 
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
 
Majority of modified home loans re-default, report shows
			
Here's an interesting story from CNNMoney.com. Not a big surprise when you look a little closer. Lawmakers, in an effort to get re-elected, push for solutions that treat the symptom, not the disease. In this case, poor money habits fueled by disinformation spread by banks and credit-card companies have lulled society into thinking that debt is good, that credit scores are more important than equity. And when people get in too deep, instead of working on the real issue, lawmakers pass kneejerk multibillion-dollar bailouts for everyone (except, of course, those suffering in silence and making their payments).Bulletin! Loan mods don't work. They are Band-Aids on cancer. Banks don't want to do them. Urban myths perpetuate misguided hope and third-party legend: "A guy I know told me about their Uncle who found a non-profit that is 'getting good results' on mods." Less than 1 in 4 people who make it through trial payment programs actually get a permanent mod. And then 75% of those end up defaulting again. Because changing someone's payment doesn't change their habits. Let's work on the real issue, and in the meantime, we need to clear out this distressed housing inventory. By Les Christie, staff writerCNNMoney.comNEW YORK -- Most borrowers who have had their  mortgages modified through a government-sponsored program will redefault  within 12 months, according to a report released last week.Between  65% and 75% of loans that are modified through the Home Affordable  Modification Program but not backed by the federal government are likely  to go bad, according to the report released by Fitch Ratings, a  N.Y.-based credit-rating agency. The main reason these borrowers continue to struggle is that HAMP  does nothing to solve the rest of their debt problems, the report added.  "Many of these borrowers still have very heavy levels of other  debt," said Diane Pendley, a Fitch managing director, "auto loans,  credit cards and other expenses. The HAMP modifications reduce housing  expenses down to 31% of income but do not touch these other  obligations."On average, HAMP-modified borrowers, according to  Pendley, have 64% of their monthly pretax income spent before they even  buy a quart of milk. If even a small emergency arises -- an unexpected  car repair, a medical bill or a loss of overtime income -- they're in  trouble."We're talking borrowers who don't have cash reserves,"  said Pendley. "If they did, they wouldn't be in this position in the  first place. It doesn't take much for them to get in the same situation  again"Jay Brinkmann, the chief economist for the Mortgage Bankers  Association, finds nothing at all surprising about the Fitch finding.  "Over the course of studying this over several years," he said, "we find  re-default rates from 40% to 60% on modified mortgages. You have  borrower behavior that keeps coming back." When that  happens, lenders are much more likely now to recommend that borrowers  opt for foreclosure alternatives instead of modifying loans a second  time. Currently, according to the Fitch report, about half of  prime borrowers who lose their homes now do so through foreclosure. The  other 50% go through short sales, in which they sell their homes for  less than what they owe the bank, or deed-in-lieu, a transaction where  the bank takes back the property directly and forgives the outstanding  balance.The  servicers have been encouraged to rev up their short sale engines by  the Treasury Department, which runs HAMP and its sister program, Home  Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA), which provides cash  incentives to the parties who agree to short sales.Now, when  borrowers re-default on HAMP mods or other bank workouts, banks are much  more likely to offer help to execute a short sale or deed-in-lieu."HAFA  gave the servicers an indication that this is where they should take  these [re-defaulting loans]," said Pendley. "The banks are now assisting  borrowers; they're being much more proactive, like helping them find  real estate brokers for short sales."The benefit of these  transactions for borrowers is that it lets them move on more quickly  with their lives. They can get out from under the unaffordable mortgage  payments, find a cheaper rental, start to, perhaps, save a little cash  and start to rebuild their credit scores.Brian Bean Real Estate Brokerhttp://www.scott-brian.com/http://www.orangecrestriversidehomes.com/Labels: Corona, Foreclosure, Home Prices, Inland Empire, Loan Modification, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Real Estate, Riverside, Short Sales, Statistics, Temecula 
			  
			  
			  
			  
	
			  
			 
			
 
Thursday, June 17, 2010
 
Senate approves new tax-credit closing deadline
			
Here's an update on the federal tax credit, in which buyers who opened escrow on their purchase by April 30 were required to close on or before June 30. Looks like we may be closer to an extension ...Inman NewsThe Senate has amended a bill to give homebuyers who  were under  contract on a home purchase by April 30 an additional three  months to  close the deal and claim the federal homebuyer tax  credit.Extending  the deadline for closing from June 30 to Sept. 30  would allow lenders  more time to clear a backlog of 180,000 homebuyers  nationwide, said  amendment sponsor Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev.The amendment  to HR 4213, the "American Jobs and Closing Tax  Loopholes Act of 2010"  -- which primarily extends unemployment insurance  benefits -- was  approved in a 60-37 vote Wednesday. The vote was mostly along  party  lines, with only four Republicans in favor and one Democrat   opposed."While I am disappointed that more Republicans did not  support  this common-sense measure to strengthen the economy and reduce  the  deficit, I am committed to ensuring that more Nevadans and Americans   can become homeowners and that this amendment becomes law," Reid said   in a statement.The House passed an earlier  version of the bill in  December, and the Senate approved its own version  in March. The Senate  is currently working on resolving differences  between the two bills.The  National Association of Realtors  supports the amendment, saying  Realtors have reported that as many as  one-third of qualified  applicants have been told by lenders that their  loans will not close  before June 30 because of the sheer volume of loan  applications in the  pipeline.The amendment does not extend the  deadline for homebuyers to  qualify for the tax credit, NAR said in  urging lawmakers to approve it,  but simply extends the deadline for  closing transactions already in  contract."Since these  applications were already in the pipeline and  figured into the program's  cost, the extension of the closing deadline  should not incur any  further government costs," NAR President Vicki Cox  Golder said in a statement.There has been some speculation  that some  homebuyers will attempt to submit fraudulent claims for the  tax credit  by backdating documents showing they were under contract by  April 30,  and that extending the deadline for closing would expose the  government  to more fraudulent claims.Brian  Bean Real Estate Brokerhttp://www.scott-brian.com/http://www.orangecrestriversidehomes.com/Labels: Corona, Foreclosure, Home Prices, Inland Empire, Loan Modification, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Real Estate, Riverside, Short Sales, Statistics, Temecula 
			  
			  
			  
			  
	
			  
			 
			
 
Friday, June 04, 2010
 
Senate approves SB 1178 extending anti-deficiency protection
			
Great news out of Sacto this week! What many people don't realize is that the banks can -- and will -- try to pursue a deficiency against a homeowner ... if the homeowner signs off on it during a short sale. In California, it's a four-year statute of limitations. Think you won't be back on your feet in four years? The banks think you will, and they are licking their chops! Don't make any assumptions. Ask your agent for evidence that they have gotten bank approvals for their clients that do not reserve the bank's right to pursue a deficiency. And get advice from your attorney before you sign off on ANY short-sale approval letter.
  Measure protecting  consumers from overreaching lenders now goes to  Assembly
  California Association of Realtors  LOS ANGELES (June 3) – The California Senate this morning approved SB  1178 (D-Corbett) by a 30 to 4 vote, extending anti-deficiency protection  for consumers who have refinanced their original mortgage loans and now  are facing foreclosure. The California Association of Realtors (CAR) is the sponsor of the consumer protection legislation.       “Currently, if a homeowner defaults on a mortgage used to purchase his  or her home -- known as a 'purchase-money mortgage' -- the homeowner's  liability on the mortgage is limited to the property itself,” said  CAR President Steve Goddard. “Unfortunately, the original law did not  extend the purchase money protection to loans that refinance the  original purchase debt, even if the refinance only was to obtain a lower  interest rate. SB 1178 corrects this inequity and extends the same  protections to consumers who refinance their home loans.       “Today’s vote was a victory for homeowners in California,” he said. “SB  1178 now moves to the Assembly for approval. CAR is calling on our  elected representatives to swiftly pass this much-needed legislation and  send it to Gov. Schwarzenegger for signature.”Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 100 years, the California Association of Realtors (www.car.org) is one of the largest  state trade organizations in the United States with nearly 160,000  members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate.  C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles. Brian Bean Real Estate Broker http://www.scott-brian.com/ http://www.orangecrestriversidehomes.com/
 Labels: Corona, Foreclosure, Home Prices, Inland Empire, Loan Modification, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Real Estate, Riverside, Short Sales, Statistics, Temecula 
			  
			  
			  
			  
	
			  
			 
			
 
 |